Why Lightning McQueen is a Cheater in Cars 3
1. Established Rules in the Cars Universe:
- In Cars 1 and Cars 2, the races follow real-world motorsport rules, where each car competes individually under strict regulations.
- Each car is its own competitor, represented by their unique number and identity (e.g., Lightning McQueen is #95). These numbers represent registration for the race, which cannot simply be swapped out or transferred mid-race.
- Substitutions are not allowed in individual races. In real-world racing (e.g., NASCAR or Formula 1), once the race starts, no one can swap places with another racer.
2. What Happens in Cars 3:
- Lightning McQueen, struggling in the race, decides to have Cruz Ramirez take over for him. She wears his number (#95), despite not being an official registered racer in the event.
- According to a vague "loophole" Smokey finds in the rulebook, this substitution is allowed, though the rule is never clearly explained and contradicts the previous films’ race regulations.
- Cruz was not a registered competitor, was not racing for the duration of the event, and had no qualifying position—yet she suddenly becomes the competitor under Lightning's number.
3. Contradiction of Previous Movies:
- In Cars 1, every racer (Lightning, Chick Hicks, and The King) competes as an individual entity. Lightning’s mistakes are his own, and he cannot simply tag someone else in to finish the race.
- The integrity of the race and competition is central to the plot. The rules were always consistent with real-world expectations: you are responsible for your own performance as the racer registered under that number.
4. Why Lightning McQueen is a Cheater:
- Substitution Violates Race Integrity: By having Cruz substitute for him mid-race, Lightning is essentially bypassing the requirement that only the officially registered car (himself, #95) can compete in the event. This breaks the established rules.
- Unfair Advantage: Cruz Ramirez comes in fresh, having not raced or been fatigued like the other competitors. She essentially becomes a "new car" entering an ongoing race with the benefit of McQueen’s performance up to that point, which is an unfair advantage over the other racers who completed the entire event.
- Contradiction of Cars Universe Logic: The sudden invention of a loophole allowing the swap contradicts everything we've been shown about racing in the previous two movies. No other racers in the universe have been shown to be able to swap places with another car and continue the race under the same number.
Common Objections and Counterarguments:
1. Objection: "The rule allowing Cruz to replace McQueen is legitimate because the movie explains it as a legal loophole."
Counterargument:
- While the movie introduces this rule as a legal loophole, it still contradicts the established rules from Cars 1 and Cars 2, where no such substitutions were ever allowed or even hinted at.
- Legal loopholes can exist in real-world sports, but when they are exploited, they are often considered unethical or unfair, even if technically legal.
- The rule is hastily introduced and feels shoehorned in for narrative reasons rather than being an organic part of the Cars universe’s race regulations.
2. Objection: "Cruz deserves the chance to race, and McQueen is simply helping her out."
Counterargument:
- While Cruz may deserve her chance to race, the way it happens is illegitimate. She wasn’t registered for the race, she didn’t qualify, and she didn’t participate in the earlier parts of the race.
- Helping Cruz shouldn’t come at the cost of breaking race rules and fairness for other competitors. Cruz entering the race at the last moment gives her an unfair advantage.
- The integrity of racing is built on the idea that each competitor races on their own merit. By subbing her in, McQueen undermines that.
3. Objection: "McQueen isn’t cheating because he doesn’t break any official rules—he's just using a loophole."
Counterargument:
- Even if the loophole is technically allowed, exploiting a rule that contradicts the fundamental principles of fair competition is still ethically questionable.
- The Cars universe established a precedent where the racers themselves had to finish what they started. Substituting Cruz represents the opposite of this ethos.
- Just because something is legal doesn’t mean it’s fair or right. McQueen is still subverting the competitive spirit by letting Cruz take his place and use his number to continue the race.
4. Objection: "The loophole allows the race to be more exciting and provides a satisfying character arc for Cruz."
Counterargument:
- While the story benefits from Cruz’s victory and her development, the way it happens undermines the competitive integrity of the race.
- There are other ways Cruz could have achieved her moment without needing to break the established race structure. She could have entered the race as a registered competitor or been given her chance in a future competition.
- Cruz’s victory would be more meaningful if she had earned it within the proper confines of the race, instead of being tagged in at the last minute.
5. Objection: "Lightning McQueen is not cheating because Cruz is doing the racing, not him."
Counterargument:
- By allowing Cruz to race under his number and finish the race that he started, McQueen is still benefiting from the outcome of her performance.
- Even if McQueen isn’t physically driving, he’s the one who made the decision to substitute Cruz, and he still takes credit for her success.
- In real-world racing, the individual competitor can’t be replaced mid-race unless the event is explicitly a team event, which this race was not.
6. Objection: "But Smokey finds the loophole in the rules, so it must be allowed."
Counterargument:
- Just because Smokey finds a loophole doesn't mean the rule makes sense or aligns with the spirit of the competition.
- The loophole introduced in Cars 3 is inconsistent with the rules established in the first two movies, where racers were treated as individual competitors responsible for completing the race.
- If such a loophole existed all along, why was it never exploited or mentioned in previous races, where competitors could have used it to gain an advantage?